Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Here are rigorous skeletals of all Australia's sauropods that I could find. I couldn't find any pics of the fossils of Austrosaurus mckillopi (although Mary and Elliot should be good enough, right?), and there's more material for Rhoetosaurus browneiDiamantinasaurus matildae and Elliot that I haven't added to the skeletals.

Top front: Diamantinasaurus sp. (via Poropat et al., 2016)
Top back: Diamantinasaurus matildae (Matilda) (modified from Hocknull et al., 2009)
Middle left: Savannasaurus elliottorum (via Poropat et al., 2016)
Middle right: Rhoetosaurus brownei (modified from Longman, 1926)
Bottom far left: Austrosaurus sp. (Mary) (© 2003 Steve Salisbury, modified)
Bottom left: Austrosaurus sp. (Elliot) (© 2003 Steve Salisbury, modified)
bottom right: Wintonotitan wattsi (Clancy) (modified from Hocknull et al., 2009)

Scale bars = 1 meter
Australian Sauropods by PLASTOSPLEEN
Add a Comment:
 
:iconornithopsis:
Ornithopsis Featured By Owner Nov 26, 2016  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
It's cool to see them all in one place. I hadn't realized how much smaller the second Diamantinasaurus specimen was! This makes me want to get back to work on those sauropod skeletals I have unfinished...

Some additional information on these sauropods: New material of the Diamantinasaurus type individual not figured by Hocknull et al. 2009 is known, including two dorsal vertebrae, a partial sacrum, a coracoid (originally described in part as a sternal) and a radius. Rhoetosaurus was a vulcanodont-grade sauropod so I'd recommend reconstructing its proportions after Barapasaurus, Spinophorosaurus, Shunosaurus, and/or Tazoudasaurus, with a shorter neck. There's a paper describing the partial hind limb of Rhoetosaurus, and mentions fairly substantial additional material of the type individual. I haven't been able to find the papers that describe anything else of it, unfortunately. Where did you get the image of its caudals?

Finally, just FYI, the Wintonotitan, Diamantinasaurus, and Savannasaurus skeletals are CC-BY which means you should cite the source if you use or modify them.
Reply
:iconplastospleen:
PLASTOSPLEEN Featured By Owner Nov 26, 2016
Thanks, this is just the response I wanted, thanks.
I won't updated the skeletals of Matilda, as for the purposes of this version they aren't needed. Thanks for the info on Rhoetosaurus, I forgot that not all large sauropods were titanosaurs, so I'll get onto updating it. The caudals are at the end of its original description, which is a very nice clear photo.

I'll update this journal to mention that these don't have all the material present.
Reply
:iconornithopsis:
Ornithopsis Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2016  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Thanks for the link to the description. I'd been unsuccessful in finding it before.

Thinking large sauropods were all titanosaurs is an understandable mistake, after all, titanosaurs are obviously the best dinosaurs.
Reply
:iconplastospleen:
PLASTOSPLEEN Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2016
Indeed, they are great.
I have also found a bunch of new info today, including 8 new aussie sauropods, and that Elliot has been classified as Diamantinasaurus matildae, (and Mary is probably the same, but I'll wait for australianageofdinosaurs.com to update to be sure), scans of the origional description of Austrosaurus mckillopi, 2 large titanosaurs, 4 other sauropods and a juvenile sauropod.
I'll make my own skeletals of all of the ones I can find bones of over the next few weeks.
Reply
:iconornithopsis:
Ornithopsis Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2016  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
So four Diamantinasaurus skeletons known to date then, huh? That's pretty well-known for a titanosaur. Nice.

I just found that Longman described the rest of Rhoetosaurus in this 1927 paper, in case you're still looking for information on the rest of it.

I look forward to seeing your skeletals!
Reply
:iconplastospleen:
PLASTOSPLEEN Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2016
I figured out the size by getting the size of the actual paper and scaling it down to be actual size compared to the skeletal, as in the paper instead of using a scale bar, the bones are all one sixth of the actual size...
Reply
:iconplastospleen:
PLASTOSPLEEN Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2016
Thanks a ton, I just got done with the original Austrosaurus mckillopi specimens, which have odd proportions, although I can't find the size of them which is a bugger.
Reply
:iconmegabass22:
megabass22 Featured By Owner Nov 26, 2016  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Nice
Reply
:iconceratopsia:
Ceratopsia Featured By Owner Nov 26, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
Beautiful.
Reply
:iconstolpergeist:
Stolpergeist Featured By Owner Nov 25, 2016
Interesting to see their sizes compared
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×

Featured in Collections

Journal Collections by DinoBirdMan




Details

Submitted on
November 25, 2016
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
2,884 (7 today)
Favourites
12 (who?)
Comments
10
×